Warren Severin for U.S. Congress in District 5, Arizona

The Severin Option

Search

Google


WWW
Severin4Congress

Latest news

October - If my website doesn't look much different from two years ago, it's because my positions haven't changed much since two years ago. Nobody can call me a 'flip-flopper'. Be that as it may. Once again, I have essentially nil probability of winning. My purpose in running is to steer discussion to important topics and keep my opponents honest (if that's possible...). So far I've engaged Harry and Dave in a couple of debates and the differences are about what you'd expect. Next week, 10/22, will be a couple of televised debates, on channel 8 (Horizon) and on Scottsdale cable which often goes to CSPAN.

Candidate Sites

I will post links to other Libertarian candidates as their website addresses become available.

Social Security ...

SS Card"It is, in short, a law that will take care of human needs and at the same time provide the United States an economic structure of vastly greater soundness." – Franklin Roosevelt on Social Security


Senator Barry Goldwater was one of the first politicians on the national scene to recommend privatization of Social Security.  He openly advocated this position during his 1964 campaign for President.  It probably cost him the election.

Social Security is a giant pyramid scheme.  It's like a multi-level marketing scheme or a "mail a dollar to the ten people on this list" chain e-mail.  Almost everyone has seen these schemes.  In the chain e-mail, the reader is invited to send a dollar to each of the ten people on the list, remove the last name on the list, put his or her name at the top of the list, and e-mail the list to ten friends.  In a few short weeks the reader will be rich, or so he's told.  This sort of scheme relies on a constantly expanding base to succeed. What happens when the base does not expand fast enough to pay the pyramid above it?  The investors lose their money.  Such schemes are generally illegal.

Social Security works like any other pyramid scheme. We pay a smaller number of people above us in the pyramid in the expectation that many more people will form a paying base beneath us.  The long-term sustainability of the system has been the matter of much debate for decades. This system worked when the ratio of payers to payees was large.  In FDR's time it was about 16:1.  Now the ratio is closer to 2:1.  The federal government has raised Social Security taxes periodically over the years to keep the system afloat. The sustainability of the system is in real doubt now that the 'baby boomers' are about to become payees instead of payers. Current estimates are that out-go will exceed income in 2012, and the system will go bust in 2015 to 2020.

Social Security Deficit

Another serious problem is that the federal government regularly takes money from our retirement plan, Social Security, and uses it to cover general expenses. Social Security taxes are periodically raised to keep the system solvent; then Congress raids the Social Security Trust Fund to cover other government expenses.  Corporate officers who raid employee retirement plans go to jail.  Our government officials get re-elected.  

The present Social Security system is not sustainable in the long term with relatively slower population growth expected in the United States. Furthermore, the system is vulnerable to government misuse.

The Social Security system should be de-emphasized over time so that newer generations of payees are not faced with investing lots of money in a plan that they will not see significant benefit from.  The best alternative is to expand the role and availability of tax-deferred Personal Retirement Plans like IRAs and 401(k)s.  These plans should be available to everyone at all wage levels and in all kinds of employment.   You need to be in charge of your own investments, because the federal government has proven that it cannot be trusted to take charge of them for you.

Medicare, Medicaid, and National Health Care ...

In most Medicare and Medicaid programs government functions as the health care insurer.  It pays practitioners for services rendered. Unfortunately, administrative overhead is tremendous and these systems are vulnerable to abuse by unscrupulous health providers. There are few incentives to investigate, curtail, and punish abuse. One estimate suggests that over ten billion dollars a year is paid in fraudulent claims. The systems are inefficient, corrupt, and wasteful of our tax dollars.

National Health Care proposals are not the answer.  Most proposals suggest expanded coverage of a universal government program to every man, woman, and child. This approach will magnify the current problems several-fold.

A better solution is for government to act as honest broker, working with private health care insurers to create incentives for health insurance plans that will provide multiple choices of coverage at multiple levels of ability to pay for anyone that wants health care insurance.